The near-collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried’s empire leaves Binance dominant

FTX’s $8bn crunch exposes a dog-eat-dog cryptosphere


The trajectory from hero to zero can be swift and brutal, as Sam Bankman-Fried can attest. The 30-year-old boss of FTX, who last year aspired to buy Goldman Sachs, this week saw his on-paper $24bn fortune crumble, as his crypto exchange suffered an $8bn liquidity crunch. SBF marketed himself as the friendly face of crypto, who was — at least ostensibly — engaging with regulators, and attracting celebrities and blue-chip investors. His empire’s downfall leaves a dog-eat-dog cryptosphere that ordinary investors, regulators and politicians should treat with caution.
SBF’s woes began on November 2, when CoinDesk revealed that his hedge fund, Alameda Research, was full of the tokens FTX prints out of thin air, FTT. Of Alameda’s $14.6bn in assets, nearly $6bn was FTT, with $2.2bn of it pledged as collateral against loans. Four days later, FTX’s arch-rival, Binance, said it would sell its $580mn of FTT in light of the revelations. This spooked customers, who withdrew as much as $6bn from FTX in three days, eroding FTT’s value from $22 to $5. FTX appealed to Binance to rescue it on Tuesday. In a surprise to precisely no one, Binance killed the deal less than two days later, citing inquiries by US securities and futures watchdogs into FTX, and allegedly mishandled customer funds. FTX limps on to find other white knights.
Its travails leave many questions, not least how an exchange, valued in January at $32bn, could suffer a liquidity crisis if correctly managed. One view is that if a project is based on little more than the greater-fool theory, quite aside from what seems like circular accounting, sooner or later the facade will come crashing down. In April, SBF likened “yield farming” — a complex crypto lending practice FTX offered — to a box whose value is determined by others’ willingness to contribute more dollars to it, prompting his Bloomberg interviewer to suggest that this sounded much like a Ponzi scheme.
This story originally appeared on: Financial Times - Author:The editorial board